Post by Tom Cruise on Jul 2, 2016 18:33:51 GMT 8
Bought a new toy recently, an OBD Bluetooth dongle and played around to explore what use has it got.
I created a few pages on the app to analyse the O2 sensors as I have been getting poor fuel consumption. Here's one of the page with 2 graphs that maps the post catalytic oxygen sensors (Sensor 2). The data are snap shot of the sensor reading during real live driving in traffic condition that goes through lots of variety of throttle input. Basically, the falling lines represent the moments where I was decelerating and foot off throttle.
The TOP graph maps the Bank 1 (driver side) Sensor 2 reading while the bottom graph maps the Bank 2 (pax side) Sensor 2.
To illustrate, bank 1 exhaust is the exhaust for cylinder 1,2&3 located at the driver side. While bank 2 refers to the exhaust for cylinder 4,5&6 at the passenger side. Each set of exhaust has its own catalytic converter. Each converter has 2 oxygen sensors. Sensor 1 being the pre-cat sensor just after the manifold. Sensor 2 located on top and middle of the catalytic converter.
Being a V6 engine both side should produce similar if not close reading especially during cruising deceleration (very lean) or during acceleration (rich). However, I noticed Bank 2 Sensor 2 is retarded and slow to react. See the graph of the lower map at the last raise of voltage (engine went into idling, zero load and vehicle stopped at traffic), it happened later than the top graph. Next is the lack of details (absence of peak) in the bottom graph compared to the top especially at the centre X axis area.
This have previously thrown out CEL in Feb but after I cleared the fault it did not happen again. Which means the problem is not bad enough and the sensor has not failed completely. Despite so, it does have an effect and contribute to higher FC (though only a small % effect as fuel trim are mainly command by sensor 1) and in the long run killing the catalytic converter with the rich mixture. If left unattended, eventually it will damage the cat, which the replacement cost will be in the range of $2k - $3k. Thus, I rather keep my sensor in good condition and let the engine does its work properly.
The graph plot helps to pin point the problem as the fault code just refers to Bank 2 below threshold efficiency. This could means a plugged catalytic converter (worst case), faulty sensor 1 (pre-cat) or faulty sensor 2 (post cat).
Mode 07: Pending emission related fault codes
Address 7E8: 1 Fault Found:
P0430 - Catalyst System; Bank 2: Efficiency Below Threshold
With clear evidence based on the graph that the bank 2 post cat sensor has aged and is retarded, I proceed to indent the post cat sensor part number 06E906265AA. At this juncture I have driven with the retarded sensor for 2 months and about 2,000km since I last erase the fault code.
Will write in the next post on the replacement steps and experience....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I created a few pages on the app to analyse the O2 sensors as I have been getting poor fuel consumption. Here's one of the page with 2 graphs that maps the post catalytic oxygen sensors (Sensor 2). The data are snap shot of the sensor reading during real live driving in traffic condition that goes through lots of variety of throttle input. Basically, the falling lines represent the moments where I was decelerating and foot off throttle.
The TOP graph maps the Bank 1 (driver side) Sensor 2 reading while the bottom graph maps the Bank 2 (pax side) Sensor 2.
To illustrate, bank 1 exhaust is the exhaust for cylinder 1,2&3 located at the driver side. While bank 2 refers to the exhaust for cylinder 4,5&6 at the passenger side. Each set of exhaust has its own catalytic converter. Each converter has 2 oxygen sensors. Sensor 1 being the pre-cat sensor just after the manifold. Sensor 2 located on top and middle of the catalytic converter.
Being a V6 engine both side should produce similar if not close reading especially during cruising deceleration (very lean) or during acceleration (rich). However, I noticed Bank 2 Sensor 2 is retarded and slow to react. See the graph of the lower map at the last raise of voltage (engine went into idling, zero load and vehicle stopped at traffic), it happened later than the top graph. Next is the lack of details (absence of peak) in the bottom graph compared to the top especially at the centre X axis area.
This have previously thrown out CEL in Feb but after I cleared the fault it did not happen again. Which means the problem is not bad enough and the sensor has not failed completely. Despite so, it does have an effect and contribute to higher FC (though only a small % effect as fuel trim are mainly command by sensor 1) and in the long run killing the catalytic converter with the rich mixture. If left unattended, eventually it will damage the cat, which the replacement cost will be in the range of $2k - $3k. Thus, I rather keep my sensor in good condition and let the engine does its work properly.
The graph plot helps to pin point the problem as the fault code just refers to Bank 2 below threshold efficiency. This could means a plugged catalytic converter (worst case), faulty sensor 1 (pre-cat) or faulty sensor 2 (post cat).
Mode 07: Pending emission related fault codes
Address 7E8: 1 Fault Found:
P0430 - Catalyst System; Bank 2: Efficiency Below Threshold
With clear evidence based on the graph that the bank 2 post cat sensor has aged and is retarded, I proceed to indent the post cat sensor part number 06E906265AA. At this juncture I have driven with the retarded sensor for 2 months and about 2,000km since I last erase the fault code.
Will write in the next post on the replacement steps and experience....
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk